Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Home RSS
What's Trending »
 
 
 

Fort Dodge council orders Hydroelectric Dam study

$44,200 review is expected to speed up decision-making process

February 12, 2013

Fort Dodge City Council members opted Monday for an accelerated review of the Hydroelectric Dam and its potential role in helping to provide water for the community....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(8)

Anderson

Feb-14-13 11:21 AM

Messenger must still be smarting from the gaff that made Jay Leno's headlines when it headlined the Brushy Creek project with the "n" improperly added, hb...

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

marvin

Feb-13-13 11:12 PM

Maybe Taylor can tell us who's going to pay for his latest little project.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hbockoven

Feb-13-13 6:11 PM

I can see the headline, "After 2 million dollars worth of studies, it was decided it would only cost $900,000 to remove the D.A.M."...at a cost of 2 million, nine hundred thousand dollars to tax payers.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

duke

Feb-13-13 3:56 PM

I think there is need for another study on how many studies have been done on this , I guess some just don't understand , but that's good old Fort Dodge for ya.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hbockoven

Feb-13-13 3:18 PM

I am sure someone here has been keeping track of the cost of all the past studies? What have they all added up to and how does it compare to the cost to just removing the thing?

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hbockoven

Feb-13-13 3:16 PM

Yes, I spelled it right and it still got censored.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hbockoven

Feb-13-13 3:14 PM

What is to study? The****is there, does it or does it not retain enough water to use? If so, you install a pumping station. If not, the****has no use and removing it saves money on maintaining it. A waterway around it? Doesn't that defeat what a****does as water takes the path of least resistance and would flow around the dam. Wouldn't you need a lock type system to raise and lower water traffic going in both directions? How would they raise money for that? A toll passage?

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Colonelbanters

Feb-13-13 1:42 AM

Just get rid of the dams.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 8 of 8 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for: